Research Insight:

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and self-reported barriers to eye care among patients with diabetes in the emergency department: the diabetic retinopathy screening in the emergency department (DRS-ED) study.

BMC ophthalmology
By using this site, you agree to our Terms and Conditions.

Icon

Generated By AZcare AI

Main contributions icon

Summary

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR), a vision-threatening complication of diabetes, among diabetic patients in an emergency department (ED) setting and to identify what prevents them from seeking regular eye care. Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study, recruiting 50 clinically stable diabetic patients from one ED over 29 weekdays in 2018 and 2019. They used teleophthalmology, where digital retinal images were taken without dilating drops (nonmydriatic) on site and interpreted remotely by a board-certified ophthalmologist. Results were communicated to patients' primary care physicians. Participants also completed a survey about barriers to routine eye exams and their willingness to accept interventions promoting screening. The study found that 14 patients (28%) out of 50 had DR, and for 10 of these (20% of the total group), it was a new diagnosis. Most detected cases were mild or moderate. More than half (52%) of the participants reported at least one barrier to regular eye care, with common reasons including having too many other medical appointments (12%) and the cost of an exam (10%). Encouragingly, most patients were receptive to receiving reminder phone calls (58%) or text messages (56%) to schedule a routine eye appointment. The study concludes that using digital fundus photography in the ED can effectively identify undiagnosed DR, and addressing common barriers through patient reminders could improve screening rates. However, it was a single-center study, so findings might not apply to all ED populations. Future research should assess the practicality of expanding these programs and how many patients actually follow up after screening. The 'store-and-forward' image review also means no immediate feedback.
Main contributions icon

Related Issues

Assessing follow-up rates after ED screening.
Generalizability of single-center ED study findings.
Challenges in patient recruitment within busy EDs.
Lack of real-time feedback for patient care.
Main contributions icon

Main Contributions

1
Demonstrates DR screening feasibility in the ED.
2
Identifies common barriers to diabetic eye care.
3
Highlights patient acceptance of reminder interventions.
4
Detects a high rate of undiagnosed DR among ED patients.
Icon

More from the same authors

Publication Icon
Accessibility to and Quality of Human Eye Tissue for Research: A Cross-Sectional Survey of ARVO Members
By Andrew M Williams + 1 more
Not mentioned
No summary available for this publication.
Publication Icon
Loss to Follow Up Among Glaucoma Patients: An IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
By Lauren M Wasser + 3 more
16-08-2024
No summary available for this publication.
Publication Icon
Factors Associated with Nonreturn after Loss to Follow-Up from Glaucoma Care: An IRIS® Registry Retrospective Analysis.
By Lauren M Wasser + 3 more
20-07-2024
No summary available for this publication.
Publication Icon
Effect of a Patient Portal Reminder Message After No-Show on Appointment Reattendance in Ophthalmology: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
By Sarah Atta + 6 more
01-07-2024
No summary available for this publication.